My understanding is as follows:
Group sex is several men and women.
A gang-bang is one woman and several men (or one man and several women for a reverse gangbang)
Perhaps you have highlighted something that a number of people "don't really know" as far as the ticks on their profiles go.
So my 50cents would be . . . . .
This little old place we call earth is full of little old beings called humans, who in turn are full of little old things called . . . .. opinions, . . . (and you should I was going to make reference to feces)
This is all good and well, the only problem being that one individual does not take too kindly to another individual not sharing his or her particular opinions. While I cannot say anything regarding the Chatroom as I have not spent more than 3 minutes at any given time in there, the Forum (as Irish mentioned) has a similarly identical reaction from members, and while it can be a little long in the tooth sometimes, it often serves as a good way to see some of the contributors "true colours"
My old argument was always, "Show me I am Wrong, don't Tell me I am Wrong" as I have no doubt that I cannot possibly have it all figured out, but that more often than not just lands up with another person saying they are "offended" and the topic at hand gets passed over . . . . (reference to your "debate" part of posting)
As for your comments about the couple profiles in the Chatroom. . . . . on the forum it's 90% about the "single male"
Much like the many different "published articles" on penis size which all seem to have a little more than slight variances, this is more than likely another "topic" that may just go round and round without ever having the words "might be or may actually be or scientists think" replaced by the words " the fact is" . . . .
And anyway, does the article mention how many "volunteers" they had for the research? How they were selected? How the "squirt" was brought on . . . . . yes, yes, yes, I will go and read the article to find out.
Also have to wonder where the funds come from for such research . . . .
To the ladies that do indeed squirt and to the ladies who are still trying to learn how to, please don't let this be a deterrent to you, as C of @KC says, it's a wonderful pleasurable part of sex for her and indeed for us all.
Everyone is welcome in the Forum. Some may not agree with what you say, and you may not agree with what others say, but welcome you are.
@KC, reading your experience, I have to sit and wonder just how many times people (that's us) have had something like this happen and we simply interpreted it as "Flirting Fun" and did not take it seriously enough.
How many times did a "situation" just need the tiniest of pushes from "our" side to make it happen . . . .
Yes, I suppose those that have "swinging" experience may not have too many opportunities slip them by, but what about before the so called experience . . . . .
Very interesting takes from @Chatterbate & @Sofistikitty.
@Sofistikitty, one of the biggest mistakes men make (in my opinion) is that they read crap in magazines and on-line and wherever about how to "please women" and just about everything available to read is how they should pay more (much more) attention to the clit . . .
Perhaps if we as the male of the species, pay a little more attention to the lady we were with (as opposed to ourselves) we might actually "hear" what we are being told.
Saveways has a hole in the stall about the size of a toilet roll holder, it is not cleanly cut, and seems to be from a screw that pulled out from the wood (smaller holes right next to it as well) I personally think that it is just that people want a glory hole to be available, and this is actually not an intended glory hole. Anyway, I think the cuts & scratches you are likely to get from this particular hole would be frightening.
Of course, seeing as I have zero Glory Hole experience and I am actually only just giving my owm opinion here, it may well be an active Glory Hole.
Please do let the rest of us MP people know if it is in-fact an active Glory Hole . . .
So when a person asks another person or a few persons (people) a question, they tend to get a largely accurste answer but seldom 100% from all questioned . . . . . people tend to give the type of answer they think you expect to hear.
What I would like to know is, what is your take on oral sex?
As in:
Ladies, do you really like receiving or is it a non issue either way for you?
Men (and Stamina) do you really like receiving or is it a non issue for you?
Myself, I really like getting, however, there is such a thing as a "bad suck" and those I tend to stop rather early on.
Please, can we leave the "I like to give" part out for now (@Mike_Pta will hijack the thread on page 2 for that)
I wear one from time to time, but in all honesty, I either don't understand what it's supposed to do, or I am doing something wrong, or I . . . well, basically I don't find they make a big difference . . . . (to me that is)
